<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microcontent Missive from Contentious Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/2006/03/15/microcontent-missive-from-contentious-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2006/03/15/microcontent-missive-from-contentious-blog/</link>
	<description>email marketing, mailling list and newsletter software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Messaging Times :: GroupMail Infacta Marketing email email marketing emarketing newsletters spam :: Why People Report Your Message As Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2006/03/15/microcontent-missive-from-contentious-blog/#comment-214740</link>
		<dc:creator>The Messaging Times :: GroupMail Infacta Marketing email email marketing emarketing newsletters spam :: Why People Report Your Message As Spam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=174#comment-214740</guid>
		<description>[...] These figures remind us to focus on these fields when designing our email campaigns. Too often, micro-content such as these fields is overlooked by email [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] These figures remind us to focus on these fields when designing our email campaigns. Too often, micro-content such as these fields is overlooked by email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Twitter Effect (Remix) : The Messaging Times</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2006/03/15/microcontent-missive-from-contentious-blog/#comment-213632</link>
		<dc:creator>The Twitter Effect (Remix) : The Messaging Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=174#comment-213632</guid>
		<description>[...] a matter of fact, the average time spent on a website before moving along is 50 milliseconds. But by shortening the length of our communication to 140 characters or less requires that we pay [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a matter of fact, the average time spent on a website before moving along is 50 milliseconds. But by shortening the length of our communication to 140 characters or less requires that we pay [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Olympics of Email Marketing : The Messaging Times</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2006/03/15/microcontent-missive-from-contentious-blog/#comment-158902</link>
		<dc:creator>The Olympics of Email Marketing : The Messaging Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 07:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=174#comment-158902</guid>
		<description>[...] Microcontent Missive from Contentious Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microcontent Missive from Contentious Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Messaging Times :: Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2006/03/15/microcontent-missive-from-contentious-blog/#comment-28367</link>
		<dc:creator>The Messaging Times :: Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=174#comment-28367</guid>
		<description>[...] The study also reiterates the importance of the From and Subject fields. Let me quote from above. &#8220;80 percent of respondents delete or report messages as spam without opening the actual message.&#8221; These figures remind us to focus on these fields when designing our email campaigns. Too often, micro-content such as these fields is overlooked by email copywriters. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The study also reiterates the importance of the From and Subject fields. Let me quote from above. &#8220;80 percent of respondents delete or report messages as spam without opening the actual message.&#8221; These figures remind us to focus on these fields when designing our email campaigns. Too often, micro-content such as these fields is overlooked by email copywriters. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom O'Leary</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2006/03/15/microcontent-missive-from-contentious-blog/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=174#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Not at all Amy. Keep up the great work on Contentious. You provide great food for thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all Amy. Keep up the great work on Contentious. You provide great food for thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Gahran</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2006/03/15/microcontent-missive-from-contentious-blog/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Gahran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=174#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words, Tom. I&#039;m glad my article was useful to you.

- Amy Gahran</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words, Tom. I&#8217;m glad my article was useful to you.</p>
<p>- Amy Gahran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

