<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Write Less, Impact More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/2007/10/25/write-less-impact-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2007/10/25/write-less-impact-more/</link>
	<description>email marketing, mailling list and newsletter software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:06:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2007/10/25/write-less-impact-more/#comment-178734</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1199#comment-178734</guid>
		<description>Christopher burned the barn down just to roast a pig. Put it on a bumper sticker and it will sell.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher burned the barn down just to roast a pig. Put it on a bumper sticker and it will sell.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mbindyo John Kimeu</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2007/10/25/write-less-impact-more/#comment-138138</link>
		<dc:creator>Mbindyo John Kimeu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1199#comment-138138</guid>
		<description>Nice article.

I&#039;m doing all I can to overcome the inability to effectively communicate in writing.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated.

John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m doing all I can to overcome the inability to effectively communicate in writing.</p>
<p>Your assistance is greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom O'Leary</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2007/10/25/write-less-impact-more/#comment-92776</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1199#comment-92776</guid>
		<description>Christopher. Couldn&#039;t agree more. There will always be a need (and desire) for lenghty subject matter. What the Internet can do (and do well) with content is evidenced by Wikipedia. Give users/readers bits at a time with links to more rather than one lengthy missive. The majority of us don&#039;t read books online. Our content consumption habits are different when we&#039;re plugged in. But that doesn&#039;t mean that the need for the content doesn&#039;t exist anymore, it is just presented differently. 

Thanks

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher. Couldn&#8217;t agree more. There will always be a need (and desire) for lenghty subject matter. What the Internet can do (and do well) with content is evidenced by Wikipedia. Give users/readers bits at a time with links to more rather than one lengthy missive. The majority of us don&#8217;t read books online. Our content consumption habits are different when we&#8217;re plugged in. But that doesn&#8217;t mean that the need for the content doesn&#8217;t exist anymore, it is just presented differently. </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Richards</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2007/10/25/write-less-impact-more/#comment-92662</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1199#comment-92662</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anyone would visit the Louver but they may visit the Louvre. Oops!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone would visit the Louver but they may visit the Louvre. Oops!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Richards</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2007/10/25/write-less-impact-more/#comment-92661</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1199#comment-92661</guid>
		<description>I agree that less is more, but we need to put that in context. There is a danger to simply make everything a vacuous slogan. A headline must draw in the reader, hold the reader&#039;s attention and give something of value. 

As you know, there has been much debate about long advertising copy in contrast to short copy. It all depends on context. 

If you look at clothing catalogs or even outdoor equipment products, there is often a story involved. For example, where a tent was used, what conditions it held up in, or how itâ€™s based on an ancient tribal design. 

The story is the interesting thing and the product is a manifestation of that story. Few people who visit the Louver and see the Mona Lisa can appreciate the painting. They want to see it because this is the original that they have seen so many reproductions of. 

Seth Godin&#039;s idea of a book as souvenir has its merit. But a book (or the long form if you will) is a different experience. Just like the long tail, we shouldn&#039;t forget the long form. There is a time and place for everything. There are still business people who have the intelligence and patience to consider and reflect. There is a place for more considered argument in business writing.

Let&#039;s take the example of a complex sale. There is the messaging that simply attracts attention. That happens first. But the next stage is more detail and a discussion of why it makes sense to take the time (non-renewable resource) to invest in further examination of the offering. We now are in the long form. It needs to be easy to understand, jargon-free, but as Einstein said, â€œThings should be as simple as possible, but no simpler.â€? 

The trouble is that many academics (and people fresh out of business school) write as if they already have the attention of the audience. This is a mistake. I think when you say less is more (which I am sold on) this is where it is most applicable. But like the long tail, don&#039;t disregard the long form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that less is more, but we need to put that in context. There is a danger to simply make everything a vacuous slogan. A headline must draw in the reader, hold the reader&#8217;s attention and give something of value. </p>
<p>As you know, there has been much debate about long advertising copy in contrast to short copy. It all depends on context. </p>
<p>If you look at clothing catalogs or even outdoor equipment products, there is often a story involved. For example, where a tent was used, what conditions it held up in, or how itâ€™s based on an ancient tribal design. </p>
<p>The story is the interesting thing and the product is a manifestation of that story. Few people who visit the Louver and see the Mona Lisa can appreciate the painting. They want to see it because this is the original that they have seen so many reproductions of. </p>
<p>Seth Godin&#8217;s idea of a book as souvenir has its merit. But a book (or the long form if you will) is a different experience. Just like the long tail, we shouldn&#8217;t forget the long form. There is a time and place for everything. There are still business people who have the intelligence and patience to consider and reflect. There is a place for more considered argument in business writing.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take the example of a complex sale. There is the messaging that simply attracts attention. That happens first. But the next stage is more detail and a discussion of why it makes sense to take the time (non-renewable resource) to invest in further examination of the offering. We now are in the long form. It needs to be easy to understand, jargon-free, but as Einstein said, â€œThings should be as simple as possible, but no simpler.â€? </p>
<p>The trouble is that many academics (and people fresh out of business school) write as if they already have the attention of the audience. This is a mistake. I think when you say less is more (which I am sold on) this is where it is most applicable. But like the long tail, don&#8217;t disregard the long form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom O'Leary</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2007/10/25/write-less-impact-more/#comment-92305</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1199#comment-92305</guid>
		<description>Amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2007/10/25/write-less-impact-more/#comment-92179</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1199#comment-92179</guid>
		<description>One idea at a time; one problem at time, one solution at  time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One idea at a time; one problem at time, one solution at  time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

