<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Messaging Times &#187; kilowatt-hours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/tag/kilowatt-hours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com</link>
	<description>email marketing, list management, metrics and the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 22:46:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Hillarious Side of McAffee&#8217;s Carbon Footprint of Email Spam Report</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2009/05/21/the-hillarious-side-of-research-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2009/05/21/the-hillarious-side-of-research-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email spam and the enviornment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Magill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kilowatt-hours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McAffee report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the carbon footprint of email spam report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cost of spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Writing about the McAffee-commissioned The Carbon Footprint of Email Spam Report, conducted by I.C.F. International has consumed 10 billion kilowatt-hours.
The report has been covered in the New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Associated Press, Computer Weekly, PC World News, Yahoo, The Huffington Post, CNet and a host of other offline and online publications.
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writing about the McAffee-commissioned <a href="http://resources.mcafee.com/content/NACarbonFootprintSpam">The Carbon Footprint of Email Spam Report</a>, conducted by <a href="http://www.icfi.com/">I.C.F. International</a> has consumed 10 billion kilowatt-hours.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.google.ie/search?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;hs=ruU&amp;q=The+Carbon+Footprint+of+Email+spam+report&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=">report has been covered</a> in the New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Associated Press, Computer Weekly, PC World News, Yahoo, The Huffington Post, CNet and a host of other offline and online publications.</p>
<p>The laughter induced by <a href="http://directmag.com/magill/0421-spam-carbon-footprint/">Ken Magill&#8217;s review of the report</a> and its coverage consumed 42 billion kilowatt-hours.</p>
<p>We might be doomed. But if we go out laughing it makes it a bit easier to bear.</p>
<p>Hat tip to Ken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2009/05/21/the-hillarious-side-of-research-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
