<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Messaging Times &#187; spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/tag/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com</link>
	<description>email marketing, mailling list and newsletter software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:24:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hotmail Spam Filters Wage War on Baby Gray Seals on Your Behalf (I mean, Graymail)</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2011/10/06/hotmail-spam-filters-wage-war-on-baby-gray-seals-on-your-behalf-i-mean-graymail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2011/10/06/hotmail-spam-filters-wage-war-on-baby-gray-seals-on-your-behalf-i-mean-graymail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[email marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enthusiast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graymail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot mail spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hotmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hotmail spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hotmaill spam filters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SmartScreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Live]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/?p=2499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a bid to control what Hotmail has determined is email that you probably won&#8217;t read anyway; they have declared war on baby gray seals (I mean, Graymail). &#8220;&#8230;In previous posts on our blog, we talked about how we’ve reduced &#8230; <a href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/2011/10/06/hotmail-spam-filters-wage-war-on-baby-gray-seals-on-your-behalf-i-mean-graymail/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2011/10/06/hotmail-spam-filters-wage-war-on-baby-gray-seals-on-your-behalf-i-mean-graymail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Practical Definition of Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2009/11/05/a-practical-definition-of-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2009/11/05/a-practical-definition-of-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emarketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GroupMail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infacta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAN-Spam Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCBE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was involved in some discussions relating to email marketing and spam last year (may require registration to access). It was an enlightening exercise as I discovered that there are so many individual interpretations as to what constitutes spam. Apparently, &#8230; <a href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/2009/11/05/a-practical-definition-of-spam/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2009/11/05/a-practical-definition-of-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Nigerian Email Scam Victim</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/11/18/another-nigerian-email-scam-victim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/11/18/another-nigerian-email-scam-victim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email scam victims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email spam victims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigerian email scams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Believe it or not, there are people who think that someone really does want to give them $20 million, even though the email that notified them of it was sent to &#8220;undisclosed recipients&#8221;. All it takes, apparently, is for the &#8230; <a href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/11/18/another-nigerian-email-scam-victim/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/11/18/another-nigerian-email-scam-victim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notice Less Spam Today? Thank Brian Krebs from The Washington Post</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/11/12/notice-less-spam-today-thank-brian-krebs-from-the-washington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/11/12/notice-less-spam-today-thank-brian-krebs-from-the-washington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McColo Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;&#8230;A U.S. based Web hosting firm that security experts say was responsible for facilitating more than 75 percent of the junk e-mail blasted out each day globally has been knocked offline following reports from Security Fix on evidence gathered about &#8230; <a href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/11/12/notice-less-spam-today-thank-brian-krebs-from-the-washington-post/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/11/12/notice-less-spam-today-thank-brian-krebs-from-the-washington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Dismal Conversion Rates Pay Off for Spammers</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/11/10/how-dismal-conversion-rates-pay-off-for-spammers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/11/10/how-dismal-conversion-rates-pay-off-for-spammers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam payoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spammers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all receive spam each day in our inbox. Some of it is sent from legitimate companies taking shortcuts in their list acquisition efforts. They might have found your address at a trade show or from a local conference &#8211; &#8230; <a href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/11/10/how-dismal-conversion-rates-pay-off-for-spammers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/11/10/how-dismal-conversion-rates-pay-off-for-spammers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bulk Email vs. Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/09/11/bulk-email-vs-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/09/11/bulk-email-vs-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emarketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GroupMail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infacta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulk email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spamhaus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a evangelist for GroupMail, I talk to many people who express concerns about whether or not they will be considered spammers when they use a bulk email application. To that end, I thought that it is important to clarify &#8230; <a href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/09/11/bulk-email-vs-spam/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/09/11/bulk-email-vs-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Some B2B Recipients Think About Your Unsolicited Email</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/08/08/what-some-b2b-recipients-think-about-your-unsolicited-email/</link>
		<comments>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/08/08/what-some-b2b-recipients-think-about-your-unsolicited-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emarketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B2B email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsolicited mail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loren McDonald received a Business-to-Business (B2B) email pitch from a company who attended the same conference as he did several months ago. Rather than chuck the whole thing in the bin along with the other unwanted email in his inbox; &#8230; <a href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/08/08/what-some-b2b-recipients-think-about-your-unsolicited-email/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/08/08/what-some-b2b-recipients-think-about-your-unsolicited-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Email Lottery Scammers Add the Yahoo Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/08/06/email-lottery-scammers-add-the-yahoo-brand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/08/06/email-lottery-scammers-add-the-yahoo-brand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email lottery scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google email lottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft email lottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota email lottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo email lottery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joining Microsoft, Google, Toyota and even Sir Bobby Charlton of Manchester United fame the Yahoo brand is now being used by email lottery scammers. Again, this prize winning notification was sent to undisclosed-recipients, which leads us to believe that there &#8230; <a href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/08/06/email-lottery-scammers-add-the-yahoo-brand/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/08/06/email-lottery-scammers-add-the-yahoo-brand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Email Lottery Spammers Add Toyota to the List</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/07/23/email-lottery-spammers-add-toyota-to-their-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/07/23/email-lottery-spammers-add-toyota-to-their-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email lotteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota email lottery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve all seen the Microsoft Global Lottery spam in our inboxes over the past couple of years. The Google brand has been used by email lottery scammers as well. Now, it appears that the Toyota brand has made the cut. &#8230; <a href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/07/23/email-lottery-spammers-add-toyota-to-their-list/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/07/23/email-lottery-spammers-add-toyota-to-their-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blog Spam (resolved)</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/04/03/blog-spam-resolved/</link>
		<comments>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/04/03/blog-spam-resolved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom O'Leary</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Messaging Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingtimes.com/blog/?p=1422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As some of you might have noticed, some time went by without a post on this blog. I&#8217;m sure that you were all picking at your skin while detoxing from your daily dose of The Messaging Times. Apparently, there were &#8230; <a href="http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/04/03/blog-spam-resolved/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.messagingtimes.com/2008/04/03/blog-spam-resolved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

